Players & Ratings
-
-
@SUPERNOVA-8 @77Ezio @Bilocan-Bingul thanks for sharing your opinions guys!
-
@SUPERNOVA-8 Yeah ! In my opinion mid atacker should have low def! it means he is typical '9' every middle atacker from real world have low def in osm! same with defender and midfielders! i think they must play better on their real world own postions (sorry for my bad english LUL )
-
@Karol3 im beter of deciding with the 90/40 depending on your team
-
@Karol3 , Hi mate..
Let's say you don't know which one is better. But if you had a chance to choose between 90/9 and 90/40 forward, who would you pick? Of course we're talking about 2 players with same age, etc.. You would not think that 90/40 is worse than 90/9 right?
I believe the value of 90/40 forward is higher than 90/9 one for reasons. So I have to agree with @SUPERNOVA-8 , that forwards with high defensive ratings should be better than ones with lower def ratings no matter how you need them to be placed. Same thing should apply for defenders.
Of course it's just my personal opinion also..
-
I think 90/9 attacker is better for 4-5-1
-
The attcaker with 90/40 is better if you put him to support defense or midfielders, the striker with 90/9 is better when he only stay offensive
-
I also play 4-5-1 and for me it's important that I have a striker with low defensive stats. In my tactic, I always let them play offensive and it works really well with lower teams in the competition
-
Yes, because your striker need to stay focus in attack, not in defense.
-
Atk phrase vs Def phrase
On ball vs Off ball
Go figure.
I can tell you for almost 100% certainty that defenders with higher atk rating lead to more goals and assists.