Tactics Requests
-
@judgedredd98 offside , marking No , SOS
-
@hans-orf said in Tactics Requests:
@judgedredd98 offside , marking No , SOS
@judgedredd98 play 3 5 2 , Sliders : 80 / 70 / 59-65 , Defs defend deep, Mids stay, Fwds attack. Always get results vs 4 5 1.
" Good morning! 352 with sos or other? And for marking and offside? "
So @Hans-Orf , you are suggesting the 352 with ShootOnSight , Yes to Offside Trap, and what does marking No mean?
No to Man 2 Man ? You suggest Zonal marking I suppose, correct ?
-
Hi can you help me im playing Arsenal and today i will play vs Wolves. He normally play 3-5-2 SOS.
how can i counter him?
-
@gonçalofabiao 523 Long Ball should work wonders
-
@gonçalofabiao Will contradict my crew mate and suggest 4 2 3 1 defend deep, stay, attack only, passing. 80/70/59-65. So choose Sergiu if you have a good def, and mine if you have a good midfield.
-
Hello guys today I will be playing against PSG and my team is Marseille . Based on the past few matches , my opponent's formation is usually maintained at 433B . In that case I have put a training camp , just that i am unsure of which formation to go with . The 3 choices I have are 442 433 and 343 .
-
POSTED BY
@yuri-van-gaal said in Need help with 442b:
Re: Tactics Requests
I play with 442b possession, but I can't find the best pressure, tempo and mentality? I can't win against teams with 433b.
I play with attacking high pressure 75, and tempo around 75?!
Any help here
Thanks
-
@supernova-8 said in Tactics Requests:
@hans-orf said in Tactics Requests:
@judgedredd98 offside , marking No , SOS
@judgedredd98 play 3 5 2 , Sliders : 80 / 70 / 59-65 , Defs defend deep, Mids stay, Fwds attack. Always get results vs 4 5 1.
" Good morning! 352 with sos or other? And for marking and offside? "
So @Hans-Orf , you are suggesting the 352 with ShootOnSight , Yes to Offside Trap, and what does marking No mean?
No to Man 2 Man ? You suggest Zonal marking I suppose, correct ?many thanks, I won 1-0, thanks to both
@Hans-Orf
Tonight, I'm at +2 points from the second at the last day and I have to play away with level 3 stadium. He often plays offensive with 343/433 (but not always, sometimes he uses 5311) and has some excellent tactics. My team value, however, is about twice his (around 1.200 vs 700). What tactics should I use to guarantee at least a draw regardless of its tactics? P.S. Camps are disabled but I can't spy on him because he used secret training. Oh, referee is red, so I can’t use aggressive and high pressure. Thanks in advance for the help.
-
@wooper_nl
4231 against 433
waht the tactic for this plan ??
-
Re: Tactics Requests
Hi guys!
tomorrow I play against 1st place (I'm the second). He usually plays (and I hope will not change anything) 433B WP zonal no-off (most likely with attacking fb and push forward mid).
I'm away and he's got in overall a bit better players. How would you recommend to counter?
I was thinking about 5311WP zonal no-off with forwards support midfield, mid - stay in position, def - deep, 75-25-30, but not sure about it.And a small different question: when it's useful to use the offside trap?
Thank you in advance for advices.
-
@sante-spirinetti Hi, 5311 is a good formation against 433 in my opinion. Nevertheless, I would advise you to use counter attack instead of wing play and increase your passing speed.
You should use offside trap if your opponent's attack outnumbers your defence. If that is not the case, there is no need to use offside trap.
-
@hafti-abi said in Tactics Requests:
You should use offside trap if your opponent's attack outnumbers your defence. If that is not the case, there is no need to use offside trap.
Could you please try to explain this part once again , about the usage of the Offside Trap ? Because I'm not sure if it makes sense... The word 'outnumbers' is confusing here imo...
-
@supernova-8 said in Tactics Requests:
@hafti-abi said in Tactics Requests:
You should use offside trap if your opponent's attack outnumbers your defence. If that is not the case, there is no need to use offside trap.
Could you please try to explain this part once again , about the usage of the Offside Trap ? Because I'm not sure if it makes sense... The word 'outnumbers' is confusing here imo...
I guess "your opponent's attack outnumbers your defence" straightly means that amount of your defenders is lower than opponent's attackers. Like 3 defs vs 4 att... Correct me if I wrong.
-
@sante-spirinetti said in [Tactics Requests]
I guess "your opponent's attack outnumbers your defence" straightly means that amount of your defenders is lower than opponent's attackers. Like 3 defs vs 4 att... Correct me if I wrong.
That's exactly the meaning that I got too Saint, but it makes no sense . That's why I asked for a second explanation from our mate @Hafti-Abi
-
4-3-3b zonal marking wing play no offside forwards:attack only-midfielders:push forward defenders:defend deep-tackling:normal-Pressing,Style and Tempo 50%
-
@supernova-8 If you get your fullbacks to attack, then you effectively got only 2 defenders at the back when the possession changes. When the opponents use 2 or 3 forwards in their line-up, your defenders are in fact outnumbered. So it better to go with offside traps in such cases since going man-for-man will almost certainly result in shooting opportunities for the opposition.
-
So I am suing 4-3-3 B wing play tactic and it's getting me mostly good results. Right and left strikers are wingers with over 40 defense points but I am curious about what is the best option for the player in the middle. A player with a score 20-29 like Firmino? Or is a player with a lower defensive score (8-17) better suited for that position?
-
Hmmm... I think I need to have a rest as I wrote in the above request that I play away , but actually I play at home
Would it change formation vs 433b from 5311 to anything else or only tactics? And how.
Thank you!
-
@alanbrozovic Depends on your objective, a player like Firmino would be greatly suited for 442 / 433A, in 433B I'd prefer a poacher with less than 16 defensive stat
-
hi, how can i counter 4-4-2-A WP? I have a slightly better team on middle