WCC 2016 - Round 3
-
Group R - WCC 2016 - Round 3
RO MANIA vs REVENGE:
Final score:
P.S. The result is not confirmed yet.
The result is confirmed... don't worry.
-
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone
(but especially to Italian crews) 
-
Thnx for the battle and good luck in the future
All Star Crew: 832
GOF - U23: 1584 -
Taverna ISM vs Fat Lords
-
Grupos S. Final Result (Awaiting for confirmation)
Zeitgeist 1560
Lusitanos 840
-
Just resync
@Wahyu-sigit-madridista said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
1. First TC :
- Second TC :
- Third TC :
- Fourth TC :
- EXTRA TC :
RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts
I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks
Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp :
[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :
OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]
*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski
- Second TC :
-
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews) @J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
#THEHOLYBASTARDS #GoGunners #VaiCorinthians
"Para todo Game Over, existe um Play Again".
-
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"
-
@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"
-
-
-
Group A:
The Brotherhood vs. Lotus
[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/fa5t9j.jpg[/IMG]confirmed
-
GROUP P - Round 3
Red Skulls :1291
Osm Striker Ultras :1178difference +113
confirmation of the rival captain (chwris)
-
Just resync
@Wahyu-sigit-madridista said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
1. First TC :
- Second TC :
- Third TC :
- Fourth TC :
- EXTRA TC :
RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts
I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks
Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp :
[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :
OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]
*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski
@wahyu sigit
There are not the dates on these screens... it is not admissible...God of crew Olympique Lyonnais French Legends
- Second TC :
-
@Sawsilvio
Yes mate, the rules are stupid.
There are much noob crews who disrupt the fair-play, so many strong crews got knocked-out and some weak (or not especially strong) crews go to the next round.
Next time think good before you participate in a tournament with +120 crews.
Best regards.OSM World Champion 2019&2020/WNT Winner 17/18
-
@wahyu sigit
There are not the dates on these screens... it is not admissible...@OL.Lyonnais11
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Fifth
You want the date right? Now you get it.
-
Hello @Adilmo-Rocha this results is unconfirmed (AAM vs MP), but you still put it in the document. Every 1 point is very valuable for us. Because in other groups, many crews who do not respect by leaving the competition.
And with all due respect, you might forget to change it #regards
Where there is a will, there is a way. Say no to resign
فَإِنَّ مَعَ الْعُسْرِ يُسْرًا . إِنَّ مَعَ الْعُسْرِ يُسْرً
![http://i66.tinypic.com/fa5t9j.jpg[/IMG]](http://i66.tinypic.com/fa5t9j.jpg%5B/IMG%5D){kind=link}