MaxMorlock_NL last edited by
However, I think that a good manager can handle it in highs as in lows
And why do you hide behind your 194 million squad and do not play like the manager of Sangju Sangmu with 48 million who plays in your league? Either because you are not a good manager or because you know that what you wrote is nonsense! I beleave so, the latter is the reason!
Dammy111_NL last edited by
@maxmorlock_nl Lol, maybe I'm bad, maybe I'm writing non-sense; who knows...^^
I'd say it's because of what I (already) said: not only building, not only tactics. Both have their importance, as the ability to handle a calendar, your players' morale & form, luck, good/bad series, and other stuff..
SHEET LFS-CUP: https://ufile.io/554bu
Dammy111_NL last edited by
LFS-Cup / Round 2
Ik doe het morgenochtend wel even voor groep 5.
Harry Hirsch_NL last edited by
Just a short evaluation of the facts this afternoon, matchday 6
Group 1: Average squad value 155.4 million
Group 2: Average squad value 148.9 million
Group 3: Average squad value 155.8 million Group with highest squad value !!
Group 4: Average squad value 133.0 million
Group 5: Average squad value 130.9 million
Group 6: Average squad value 145.0 million
Placement Pohand Steller: Average of all 6 groups 8.83
Placement Suwon Samsung: Average of all 6 groups 7.16
Sum of both teams: 16
Target: 7 and 3 = 10
From the overview it is quite clear that both teams on the part of the engine have a deficit and probably can not reach the target
Over the years I've been watching this in all the leagues I've played (in the world version I've played all the countries before) and found out that there are teams in each league that have these engine deficiencies. It's not about the best manager and the best tactic.
In Germany we say: With these teams you can not win a flower pot.
I will do this evaluation again and see if the results in the ranking have changed to the advantage.
qsgyj_NL last edited by
Dammy111_NL last edited by Dammy111_NL
@harry-hirsch_nl It's interesting, but what do you say about the teams repartition then?
All the duo's that made the best score in the first round all received the same teams.
Your teams belong to the 5th/6 ranked duo's after the 1st round.
Could you make the same calculation with duo #6 (Pakket D) and duo #1 (Pakket F) in order to see if there's a link?
I'm sure you'll notice a correlation!
Braamsie-_NL last edited by
Ff snel een tussenstand van Groep 4:
Braamsie + lsalvador = 2
Fc Roland Utd + Kevin Wybo = 4
Flougle92 + Sanderjep15 = 6
Gilles Brunelos + lapierre = 6,5
Furkantaktak + halimfener = 9,5
Rosenborg + rassrass = 11
Geen idee of we nog met gemiddelde positie werken of met punten... Maar aangezien ieder duo samen 10 ds punten heeft geeft het een aardig beeld. En heb geen tijd om de hele sheet in te vullen
Als ik tussendoor tijd heb doe ik er nog wel eentje.
Alles is uiteraard zonder strafpunten want die ken ik niet.
Zo moet niemand jaloers zijn.
Wie een fout ziet behalve de naamfout die ik ergens had gemaakt mag het melden.
Doe het nog wel eens 1 van de dagen.
Brazilian STARRR_NL last edited by
Sorry guys but why are you making a table with manager points? If I understand right the rules, this table doesn't matter, only the places in the table are important
@brazilian-starrr_nl I updated the score system because there were some problems with it in the first round ^_^
Where can I see changes in the rules? it's strange that we'll only find out about it right now.
we played half the tournament, with the calculation of the rules that were in the 1st round
@reaktorr I have posted an explanation as to why in the topic of the 2nd round draw. The rules, which are pinned on this forum, have been changed accordingly.