OSM WC 2019 Edition
-
hi : proposal 2
-
@markez17 proposal 2
-
Proposal 2
-
I prefer the proposal 1, because the proposal 3 reduces the number of manager, and the proposal 2 makes too difficult, for those who aren’t in the best 28, to reach the final
-
-
-
proposal1
-
-
Proposal 2.
-
Proposal 1
-
proposal 2
-
proposal 2
-
Last night, while i was out taking a beer, i got an alternative to the proposal 2 better than proposal 3 and with 3 stages and not 4.
Proposal 2.1
-
Best 4 qualified from last edition final + Best 8 from manager points WC list are automatically qualified and don't need to play a 1st WC round.
-- 1st round: 12 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 3 goes to next round)
-- Semifinal: 4 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 3 goes to next round)
-- Final: 1 league with 12 manager to know our 2019 WC champion. -
With this proposal, we are going to have in total 156 users with same system than last edition but giving some recognition to the best users form last edition final and those users who recollect more points for this edition!
Thank you all for your interest and messages!
PS: All your post have been only for say a proposal but no one have a suggestion. I understand that nobody have an alternative but if I only want to let you all knowthat anyone can make a logical suggestions. I got one by private message about make leagues with only 8 teams and not 12 to finish it fastly but that's not the idea that we want for this competition!
ES Mod - (19/05/12 - 31/01/13) || ES Staff - (31/01/13 - 31/03/15) || Spanish CM - (01/04/15 - 24/05/16)
General Manager - (24/05/2016 - 11/2021) || Events Manager - (27/09/2017 - 11/2021)
https://www.twitch.tv/MMarquez92 -
-
hi guys
i like proposal 2 -
Proposal 2
-
Here i post my idea for this WC edition, i don't want surprises when qualification reach the end during May and i think would be nice to listen your suggestions (Logical of course, non sense post will be deleted!) in the public topic.
If you are member of a management forum team, you must have a topic where talk about competitions like this and your CM will share directly to me in our private forum. If anyway you want to share your suggestions here, feel free to do it!
Proposal 1
- Keep like last edition.
-- 144 users and 3 phases (12-4-1 leagues).
Proposal 2
-
Best 4 qualified from last edition final + Best 24 from manager points WC list are automatically qualified and don't need to play a 1st WC round.
-- 1st round: 11 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 4 goes to next round)
-- 2nd round: 6 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 4 goes to next round)
-- Semifinal: 2 leagues of 12 managers each one.
-- Final: 1 league with 12 manager to know our 2019 WC champion. -
With this proposal, we have 160 users in total and we have something "different".
Proposal 3
-
Best 4 qualified from last edition final are automatically qualified and don't need to play a 1st WC round.
-- 1st round: 11 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 4 goes to next round)
-- Semifinal: 4 leagues of 12 managers each one. (Best 3 goes to next round)
-- Final: 1 league with 12 manager to know our 2019 WC champion. -
With this proposal, we have 136 users in total. It's not my favourite because i don't want to reduce users number but it's an alternative to the Proposal 2 with only three phases and not four.
Of course, it's depend about the cheater number in WC list. I would like to take back the 192 users but we must think that probably again we can't have easily so much users and i prefer to save my back and not promise something that i won't be able to give later.
I'm thinking about "divisions" depending of total manager points, for example +40k MP, playing in a WC side and the rest to the other side until reach a numbers of users who get a place. I think it's better for other new competition and not for WC.
Thanks for your time and i'll be waiting to read anything to improve this championship! (If you think that you have a good idea but for a new championship, let me know by private message and not in this topic please)
- Keep like last edition.
-
-
Proposal 2!
