WCC 2016 - Round 3
-
Group G:
Born in the USSR: 1628
TRABZONSPOR1461: 834
Difference: 794Final Table:
I want to thank TRABZONSPOR1461 for such an interesting battle, they kept on fighting until the very last round, they have been changing their tactics and game strategy making us sweat all the time, this battle was like a good game of chess actually :).PS. the result yet to be confirmed by opposition crew captain.
-
WCC R3 Grup F
Result confirmed by @boskovice
-
WCC - Group D - Round 3 :
Result confirmed by Mano Meneses.
LSD : 1254
NACAO : 1033 -
Score is confirmed
-
ROUND 3, GROUP N.
Awaiting confirmation of the rival captain
-
My thanks and congratulations to our opponents for this amazing and fought battle played with great commitment and fair play
Waiting confirmation by their captain
"Be the change you want to see in the world!" M.K. Gandhi
“Sometimes it’s the people no one imagines anything of who do the things that no one can imagine.” The Imitation Game -
Group R - WCC 2016 - Round 3
RO MANIA vs REVENGE:
Final score:
P.S. The result is not confirmed yet.
The result is confirmed... don't worry.
-
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews) 
-
Thnx for the battle and good luck in the future
All Star Crew: 832
GOF - U23: 1584 -
Taverna ISM vs Fat Lords
-
Grupos S. Final Result (Awaiting for confirmation)
Zeitgeist 1560
Lusitanos 840
-
Just resync
@Wahyu-sigit-madridista said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
1. First TC :
- Second TC :
- Third TC :
- Fourth TC :
- EXTRA TC :
RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts
I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks
Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp :
[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :
OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]
*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski
- Second TC :
-
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews) @J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
#THEHOLYBASTARDS #GoGunners #VaiCorinthians
"Para todo Game Over, existe um Play Again".
-
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"
-
@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.
Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"
