OSM WC 2021 Edition

timilic7 · 4 Mar 2022, 10:13

timilic7 · 6 Mar 2022, 11:44

hello staff, still no news for the world championship? the members of the top 100 are waiting impatiently to finally play against a real opponent, or even discover what a loss is!!!!!!
a discovery for them with their admirable winning percentage!!!

AlexandraAlisDD · 11 Mar 2022, 16:21

@timilic7 The classification of medals is not a good and just means of selection.

Regards
AlexandraAlis

timilic7 · wrote on 11 Mar 2022, 16:21

@alexandraalisdd Obviously!!! We joke about this ridiculous medal ranking

FeelStrikeX · 28 Mar 2022, 07:24

Well, something that everyone liked and was part of the OSM culture was the WC that took place every year, the classification method being the old points ranking after the end of this ranking the tournament could not find a fair method to classify the players, since that the current medal system is greatly circumvented by players who are at the top of the rankings when entering leagues full of CPU, or leagues with accounts controlled by him to favor him or even entering leagues with very weak players where he has no difficulty in win the league.

As it seems obvious the previous points system used will not return, so how can we classify players for the tournament, taking into account maintaining a certain kind of quality within the players that will participate?

Well, my proposal for this problem that everyone wants to see solved because it's something that is part of OSM's own culture is to use the app's battles.

How would it work, taking into account the quality detail. Well, if only the app battles wouldn't help to solve the problem, because many would create a new group and battle weaker Crews to get the most points.

Problem that can be solved with the existing divisions of the groups, being given a different bonus taking into account the division where the Crews are.

Something like that:

OSM Division (+25001)

Final league score x 3.5 bonus

Legend Division (17501-25000)

Final league score x 2.5 bonus

World Star Division (10001-17500)

Final league score x 1.75 bonus

Champion Division (5001-10000)

Final league score x 1.0 bonus

Pro Division (2501-5000)

Final league score x 0.5 bonus

Semi-pro Division (1001-2500)

Final league score x 0.25 bonus

Amateur Division (0-1000)

Final league score x 0.1 bonus

This idea is not only aimed at maintaining a historic tournament, but it will also allow the groups themselves to give more importance to the app's battles, which will lead to greater development of the groups, improving the quality of the players.

With this method the WC will have the best OSM players participating, although the higher rankings of the divisions will give more points, the difficulty of scoring in these rankings is higher than in the lower rankings, which raises the quality of the tournament.

The qualification period for the tournament could be the same (6 months), or it could even be increased to a period of 9 months for even new groups that may have a period to move up in rankings to increase their chances of having representatives in the WC .

However, the advantages of this method of guaranteeing the quality of the players participating in the WC, since it is impossible to manipulate the results, the advantage of making the app's battles have an extra meaning, the advantage that everyone can, if they want, be in the WC if they strive, the very development of the groups that will evolve for the better and most importantly maintain a tournament that is part of the culture and history of OSM.

JetonT. · wrote on 27 Mar 2022, 15:12

Ive never played in this tournament because never cared for old ranking just like with new ranking. But looks like GB has abandoned this tournament permanently and it's sad.

Majstor Matt · 1 Apr 2022, 14:14

@feelstrikex Sounds good, but not all players play crew battles, so It is unfair to those who do not play them..

timilic7 · 1 Apr 2022, 09:37

@feelstrikex Congratulations for your work, your explanations and your idea.
Of course, nothing is perfect, but at least it would be representative of the level of the participants. I like your idea, not perfect, but nice and logical.

I will never understand how GB can accept that all of its highest representatives in the rankings are either cheaters or players who only play against computers and therefore do not bring money to GB...
And no more one return from them on all this, or on the disappearance of the toilet for 2 years...

Majstor Matt · wrote on 1 Apr 2022, 09:37

@timilic7 What to expect for a game that has "Hall of Fame" in which there are mainly players who played for less than a full year and are long gone from the game... Hall of Fame is usually prestige and exclusive thing in all professions/sports.. but only on OSM it is a joke..

FeelStrikeX · 4 Jan 2022, 14:15

@majstor-matt

So, as a rule, those who are not in groups are either new players or players who intend to do the sad scenes that we have seen to be at the top of the current ranking or they are players who are kind of reforming, because some days they play other days they don't. they play this on the vast majority of players who don't have a group.

In my opinion of course.

Majstor Matt · 17 Jun 2022, 10:49

@feelstrikex Yeah, I understand. Its quite hard to find a perfect criteria.. We will see what will the come up with next..

timilic7 · wrote on 17 Jun 2022, 10:49

hello staff, still no news for the world championship?

And will we soon have news on changes to this medal system as you announced to us more than a year ago? Or is this ridiculous ranking definitively integrated in this form where only guys playing alone against the bot or with multiple accounts can be well ranked?

Yogeek · 20 Feb 2023, 15:16

@HarryPoon_NL Hello,
I suggest you to create a special pack to enter in the OSM World Championship 2023. Around 20 euros seems a good price for everyone (OSM and customers).
Of course, for a fair game this money will be the only one to spend during all the competition. It means no TC, no friendly, no training speed-up, no transfer etc during a competition with funny teams (cartoon characters, Greek gods etc.) as in the past.
It would be appreciate to have the possibility to win valuable prizes (based on the number of participants + special avatars + trophies and why not an interview on your Youtube channel. Be creative!
In order to avoid to luck to have a too important part to play, at least 4 players should have the possibility to join the next round per league... Better to have interesting leagues until the end. And no resignation.
Promotion should be very important, make something funny, please!
It is not the perfect suggestion, just the way to follow. Some details have to be finalized (number of leagues and rounds, random drawing, automatic system etc.) but that is your job!
Despite the risk to be out from the first round, even old players would be ready to pay this 20 euros pack to have fun joining a fair and competitive OSM WC instead of play in boring "pay to win" leagues.
You can do it!

Majstor Matt · wrote on 20 Feb 2023, 13:53

Love how even after all this time you guys are still optimistic about this and expect something from Miniclip They simply dont care about competitiveness, so Hall of Fame ranking is all you can expect guys

Yogeek · Y Yogeek 15 Feb 2023, 12:45

As it seems that is too much difficult for the staff to find a simple system to select participants since the end of manager points, I proposed this option to register to the tournament. I hoped a lucrative prospect would bring OSM WC to Harry's attention... lol But I realised that is too much complicated for Gamebasics, they probably think : why invest time and energy in something like that if we can make easy money with boss coins business...

SpecialOne · wrote on 21 Feb 2023, 10:56

OSM WC won't have any other edition.

It wasn't possible to find a solution to make it in a fair way and gathering the best OSM managers in an event.

If later we manage to have a solution for this we'll do it!