Game Updates
-
The ''age'' criteria should be changed and not this...
<u-20 (16, 17, 18, 19yo)
<u-23 ( only 20, 21, 22yo)
<u-25 ( only 23, 24 yo)
25 - 29yo
30+I'm tired of sending scout for a player 18-19yo and getting all 24yo...in terms of OSM a player 24yo is equal to a 60yo guy
@MenagerBL said in Game Updates:
The ''age'' criteria should be changed and not this...
<u-20 (16, 17, 18, 19yo)
<u-23 ( only 20, 21, 22yo)
<u-25 ( only 23, 24 yo)
25 - 29yo
30+I'm tired of sending scout for a player 18-19yo and getting all 24yo...in terms of OSM a player 24yo is equal to a 60yo guy
Yes!! That would be better, forget players ranking that’s fine, personally I think concentrate on age.
I’d also like the old scout list with all players and nationality and the leagues to search them from would be very nice
just a list somewhere on the forums and not a separate app like the ticket days -
These scout ratings will stay. They are part of a bigger update that will go live soon.
These new criteria are live only on Web for now but scout will bring players according with the criteria from where he was sent.
If you send scout from web, he'll bring players according new criteria.
If you send scout from App, he'll bring players according old criteria.@MenagerBL said in Game Updates:
I'm tired of sending scout for a player 18-19yo and getting all 24yo...in terms of OSM a player 24yo is equal to a 60yo guy
This not true... In fact, there are quite different, otherwise, everybody would be scouting/buying players over 30, because they are way cheaper.
Old players are also important on OSM... I believe that you got once in a while a typo from commentator about lack of experience on your squad.... he's not talking about matches played
-
@SpecialOne
Yes that's true. Old players are also important...U must have few in your team...
Then, maybe something could be done about the training...10% or 15% more progression per session. Players 24yo are bad for training, although in reality that's a very very young age. With older it's becoming only worse. For players 27-28yo and older training is practically useless...OSM World Champion 2019&2020/WNT Winner 17/18
-
@SpecialOne
Yes that's true. Old players are also important...U must have few in your team...
Then, maybe something could be done about the training...10% or 15% more progression per session. Players 24yo are bad for training, although in reality that's a very very young age. With older it's becoming only worse. For players 27-28yo and older training is practically useless...@MenagerBL said in Game Updates:
Players 24yo are bad for training, although in reality that's a very very young age.
?!?!?
Bad for training? Come on... How much more do you want players to evolve in a single season? In some leagues, with normal training, you can double player stats in a season, and I'm talking of 24 - 26 years old players (even older ones)
-
if we are on player ratings i think that osm support that makes player ratings every transfer window, must change some things based on what is happening in the leagues (top 5) for example in England top scorer is Jamie Vardy 17 goals 4 assists and in osm his rating is now 86, ridiculous, instead Nicolas Pèpè Arsenal player 3 goals 3 assists, rating from osm support 91, how is it possible ?? it would be nice if the rating would be realistic
-
I don't really understand the point why GB decided to get rid of the 90+ option for scouts and to add lower-rated scouting possibilities to the game. I haven't heard from anyone that he/she went for 50-59 rated players (except for certain situations in competitive battles), so why go even lower?
And if you say that many managers are also scouting older players, why do you delete the option to scout the best old players with a rating over 90? I mean 86+ isn't bad at all, but I don't really get the sense behind deleting the possibility of scouting 90+ players....
-
This event has just shown that the scout is shockingly bad now. Trying to get 90 rated players with the same nationality as you’re building for is very hard. Please at least put a 90 rated option back on. I thought updates was supposed to make the game better not worse
-
This change is horrible. This completely screws up the scout. There was nothing wrong with the scout, why change it. The scout isnt the problem, the way you rate players is the problem. Modric, ramos, chiellini. All of them examples of players that are rated way too low. Revert the scout back to what it was please.
-
Think GB think it would make us use the scout more, opposite for me. I like scouting and building for the same nationality. Now the scout is useless for the players you want when it comes to the 90 rated players. I’m goal 9 in a official battle and on matchday 4 the scout will no longer be used
I can’t get the 90 players I want just keeps bringing back the same poor players not making my starting 11 stronger. Only option now is be quick on the list -
Can you fix the trasnferlist please, because I have the feelings I dont have good quality players on it, and it makes the game unplayable because of not building up a team properly. I know the answer is scout, but I dont want to buy anything from the game that cost money. After all, scout is here to bring up profit to the game.
-
This change is horrible. This completely screws up the scout. There was nothing wrong with the scout, why change it. The scout isnt the problem, the way you rate players is the problem. Modric, ramos, chiellini. All of them examples of players that are rated way too low. Revert the scout back to what it was please.
I also agree with @TheBestManagerNL !!
Because you went to make changes to something that was already perfect ...
This kind of values makes no sense !!You could make so many changes and corrections in the game, and only change what should really be as it was ...
Very Sad!!
-
Yeah I saw that the scout ratings will be part of a bigger update, but it is super annoying when you put 75-84 rating search but only get three 75-78 players when I was trying to get an 82-84 players, or I do 85+ and I only get 85-87 when I was trying to get a 90+ player. This happens to me 75% of the time in my scout searches, and now it seems harder to get under 20 players with the young filter but I usually get 23+ age players. And it will only get more frustrating when the scout goes back to being 16 hours after the weekend and I will wait for my scout for 16 hours just to get a bad player I don't want. Please OSM do something about this, thanks.
-
Just go for cheaper alternatives. Better players will eventually get to the TL.
-
3 times with 3 different searches (6hours would normally be 48hours) to try and get a 90 defender using 85+ and not one back. Why would you set it to find the lowest rated players possible instead of a mixture of 85-to high 90s? Excellent work on making the scout useless
-
Okay so after the release of the new rating system, I think we should all give it a fair chance. Like this, the new scout filters might be more usable.
-
Player ratings update
Hi managers,
We want to inform you that the players ratings and leagues are ready for 2020. The league updates take place a few times a year to keep the leagues up to date after the transfer periods. Check out all new ratings and see who did well in your favourite team!
The ratings of players might be lower than you're used to. We made the players cheaper because some players' value's were getting out of hand.
After these updates it becomes even more fun to play, because players like Messi and Ronaldo will be easier to buy and train.
Have fun playing!
-
Player ratings update
Hi managers,
We want to inform you that the players ratings and leagues are ready for 2020. The league updates take place a few times a year to keep the leagues up to date after the transfer periods. Check out all new ratings and see who did well in your favourite team!
The ratings of players might be lower than you're used to. We made the players cheaper because some players' value's were getting out of hand.
After these updates it becomes even more fun to play, because players like Messi and Ronaldo will be easier to buy and train.
Have fun playing!
@AlyssaGB said in Game Updates:
Player ratings update
Hi managers,
We want to inform you that the players ratings and leagues are ready for 2020. The league updates take place a few times a year to keep the leagues up to date after the transfer periods. Check out all new ratings and see who did well in your favourite team!
The ratings of players might be lower than you're used to. We made the players cheaper because some players' value's were getting out of hand.
After these updates it becomes even more fun to play, because players like Messi and Ronaldo will be easier to buy and train.
Have fun playing! thing, they reduced the majority of the players preferred by us users (from 17 to 19 years old) all to over 70 to 74. Precisely to mix the players 65-69 and make it even more difficult.
Sincerely, Congratulations, always finding a way to make things worse.
@Hafti-Abi said in Game Updates:
I don't really understand the point why GB decided to get rid of the 90+ option for scouts and to add lower-rated scouting possibilities to the game. I haven't heard from anyone that he/she went for 50-59 rated players (except for certain situations in competitive battles), so why go even lower?
And if you say that many managers are also scouting older players, why do you delete the option to scout the best old players with a rating over 90? I mean 86+ isn't bad at all, but I don't really get the sense behind deleting the possibility of scouting 90+ players....
They heard you kkkk however, on the contrary, instead of putting more players, they reduced the OVER of most players
-
Guys, you are just ruining the game with these updates.
The updates on the scout and on the players overall don't make any kind of sense.
Please stop the changes on the game and put the things like they were before. Just for one time think about the OSM players, and not just about your own interests...
The game was close to perfection before all this inventions. So, why are you always changing what is good?
-
Star Players are supposed to be rare, so I approve this rating update - unlike people posting here. Well done on lowering standards - and no irony here.
