OSM WC 2018 Edition

[raul_alessio]

Total: 38640 points. If the league from the 9th of December had counted it would have been 49220 points.

[NeverBackDown 2oo9]

Total manager points :

[Misael777]

I miss adding a league that concluded on December 14, 2017 greetings leaving a total of 33004 points

[real madrid fc 12]

Total Points: 26151

[nelsonm91]

40885 points earned

[Yozora17]

Total Points: 46.500

[Markez17]

Hi all, as soon as i get the WC list i will know the places for this edition.
I expect to begin with the 1st round in July (First week i think!) so i will have June to check participants, send PMs... And a lot of things more to do.

• YES, i know that we passed 31st May and the period is over.
• NO, you don't need to post here your points to be able to join in WC. Was only an idea that i had and suggest here to give the topic some activity!
• NO, there isn't an exactly manager points needed to have a place.

When i have news, i will come here and post it, don't worry about it if i didn't post each day anything here. And don't forget something important... I am the only one who is organizing this competition (With Gamebasics help of course) so i'm the one who has the 100% true answers to your doubts.

Keep in contact!

@language-AR
@language-DE
@language-EN
@language-ES
@language-FR
@language-HU
@language-ID
@language-IT
@language-PL
@language-PT
@language-RO
@language-RU
@language-TR

[Adi Chivu]

Total points:34.849

[Casual1948]

Total points: 27.690

[Artem Zharkov]

Points: 39616

[MiikeL]

@MiikeL (Slot 1)

02/01/2018 - LASK Linz - 7475 manager points
29/01/2018 - RoPS - 6690 manager points
19/03/2018 - Nacional Potosí - 6630 manager points
08/05/2018 - Sol de América - 6990 manager points

Total between 14/12/2017 and 31/05/2018: 27785 manager points

I lost 10,000 points for only 4 days. My leagues ended on 10/12 and 04/06.
Good luck to everyone.

[Florida5]

@markez17 friend, is it necessary to pass the manager name so that you can see the points obtained in the requested period? or just you will set all the accounts and send messages to those who meet the requirements

[Markez17]

@florida5 i think you must read the 1st post of this topic again and the last one i posted yesterday

[rubinhosantana]

Total Points: 35.220

[Fireman one]

Fireman one
1 Laussane Sport-Suisse 04.01.18= 5495 p
2 FK Kukesi-Albania 27.01.18= 6260 p
3 Limerick-Ireland 22.02.18= 6230 p
4 Marquense-Guatemala 22.03.18= 4590 p
5 KF Laçi-Albania 14.04.18= 5655 p
6 Luftetari Albania 10.05.18= 5960 p

So, 14.12.2017-30.05.2018, total points 34190!

[Markez17]

Hey yo! I bring some news about OSM WC 2018

First of all... This time, i decide to reduce the places from 192 to 144 (12 leagues instead 16).
4 best from each league will go to second phase and 3 best of each semifinal will go the final round!

I could give you a lot of reasons and explaining about why reduce it but i want to resume in two phrases:

• I have a life and i'm not agree about check alone more than 500 accounts to find around 200 able users.
• Less places = less problems and maybe more level!

Now please, don't continue posting your points (Thanks to those users that maintain the activity here with their post of course!) because i already have a provisional list and i will try to begin sending PMs during next two weeks. Before 22nd June i promise that i will have send it all!

During this weekend i think i will update some OSM WC teams

PS: I won't send any PM during this weekend, don't be nervous!

@language-AR
@language-DE
@language-EN
@language-ES
@language-FR
@language-HU
@language-ID
@language-IT
@language-PL
@language-PT
@language-RO
@language-RU
@language-TR

[rafael 1974]

@markez17 Good evening. I know you have lots of things to do but it seems that patience is not a virtue many people have received. I have just seen quite a few posts showing their points and cups won in the past 6 months. The funny thing about it is that some of them come from other countries' moderators. I don't expect to know more than you and I'm pretty sure that your long experience organising the WC will help you, but people want some information. Openness would certainly be advisable. The more you show what you are doing, the fewer questions you will receive. Information, from my point of view, could be positive. Thus, taking into account that you know the sum of points you are meeting for this tournament, I would ask you to inform more or less the number of points that might probably be necessary to classify for it. Figures are always a nice piece of information.

I also agree with you that showing your results in front of the whole community is something that helps everybody's self pride. Let's not cut people's expressions. Why not asking managers over XXXXX points to show their results? Let us know who are the top scorers in OSM leagues. I'm sure we all would enjoy it.

Anyway, good luck and thank you for your time devoted for OSM.

[Lafuens]

Hello @Markez17,

I have no intention of playing this tournament, but because I've been tagged twice in a short period of time, I've been "forced" to follow this post. After reading the information that you gave, I would like to express something.

In my opinion, the reduction of the number of managers from 192 to 144 (25% less) is a little bit sad. I also think it could be considered unfair if we take into consideration the moment of the announcement of this new rule.
I can't stop thinking in those who have been working hard to achieve the goal of joining the WC2018, giving their best every day and spending their money and time, listening now that they have less opportunities to participate.

Markez, I'm pretty sure that we all here respect and understand that you have other things to do in your real life. Everybody has. But maybe you should reconsider other options before leaving 48 players out. Is it not possible asking for help to some of your bosses?

Best regards.

[mr oronzocanà]

@markez17 totally agree with you . bravo!!!!

[Markez17]

@lafuens said in OSM WC 2018 Edition:

Hello @Markez17,

I have no intention of playing this tournament, but because I've been tagged twice in a short period of time, I've been "forced" to follow this post. After reading the information that you gave, I would like to express something.

In my opinion, the reduction of the number of managers from 192 to 144 (25% less) is a little bit sad. I also think it could be considered unfair if we take into consideration the moment of the announcement of this new rule.
I can't stop thinking in those who have been working hard to achieve the goal of joining the WC2018, giving their best every day and spending their money and time, listening now that they have less opportunities to participate.

Markez, I'm pretty sure that we all here respect and understand that you have other things to do in your real life. Everybody has. But maybe you should reconsider other options before leaving 48 players out. Is it not possible asking for help to some of your bosses?

Best regards.

If you go to the first post on this topic, wrote by me, you can see the following:

VERY IMPORTANT: The number of manager qualified to Round 1 (192 actually) can be reduced!

Post date is November, before the qualification period started. For me, would be the best choice continue with 192 places or more but, sadly, OSM seems that doesn't have the big quantity of "fair play" and active users that some years ago. Last edition was my first time in front of the competition and i learn some details, one of them is that we must reduce the places number. Now let's see how it's work and if qualified users accept to play or decline the invitation!

@rafael-1974 said in OSM WC 2018 Edition:

@markez17 Good evening. I know you have lots of things to do but it seems that patience is not a virtue many people have received. I have just seen quite a few posts showing their points and cups won in the past 6 months. The funny thing about it is that some of them come from other countries' moderators. I don't expect to know more than you and I'm pretty sure that your long experience organising the WC will help you, but people want some information. Openness would certainly be advisable. The more you show what you are doing, the fewer questions you will receive. Information, from my point of view, could be positive. Thus, taking into account that you know the sum of points you are meeting for this tournament, I would ask you to inform more or less the number of points that might probably be necessary to classify for it. Figures are always a nice piece of information.

I also agree with you that showing your results in front of the whole community is something that helps everybody's self pride. Let's not cut people's expressions. Why not asking managers over XXXXX points to show their results? Let us know who are the top scorers in OSM leagues. I'm sure we all would enjoy it.

Anyway, good luck and thank you for your time devoted for OSM.

I don't know if i understand your post or not... But if your intention is to know the minimum points to qualify this WC edition, the list of users qualified, etc. Every year the organization bring some information about it, don't worry.

If i don't have 144 users that accept the invitation to be part of this WC edition, nobody knows how much manager points gets the last qualified. During June's last week i will have all groups for 1st round and it's the time to give some public information.

Like i said, users who post their points make the post more active but i deleted some post from users that doesn't understand how OSM WC works and now that i'm posting here more or less important information, i don't feel that would be nice have a lot of messages that hide the ones that i make to let you know how everything is going.