• French Users

    Can you explain to me the interest and the representativeness of medals when you can be level 8 in 3 championships. While players with better records and playing battles regularly find themselves much lower

  • French Users

    1609196631249.jpg 1609196633612.jpg

  • French Users

    Screenshot_20201229-002532.png
    Screenshot_20201229-002526.png
    Screenshot_20201229-002501.png

  • French Users

    division 7, 269,000 medals. 11 championships and 53% wins. the calculation for the medals is a total unknown ...

  • French Users

    The ranking of manager points is much more interesting on all points, than a single place to rank, cooler to evolve, much fairer. The medals, I didn't understand the point of that. several competitions stopped, it's very sad

  • French Users

    115999.jpg

    116000.jpg

    116001.jpg

    116002.jpg

  • French Users

    116003.jpg
    116004.jpg
    116005.jpg
    116006.jpg


  • The issue is also that there is no reason to play good managers now. I lead a good crew, with players high in the rankings, and some don't want to play in the crew league or in crew competitions anymore because by playing stronger players, their medal number will go down. (Even if they win their league with say 10 wins, 5 draws and 3 losses, that would be about 10x200+5x0-3x1200=-1600 before the end of season bonus - now imagine if they finish with 6/6/6 for example (even with the end of season bonus, you would lose medals). But they would be much better off playing weaker players, and winning everything).

    So what is the incentive for playing against strong players? Now, no one will want to play leagues with only top players if they care about their medals. There definitely needs to be a change in the system, and perhaps having one score per slot like for manager points is more suitable. Or simply changing the medal system - there are options to do so, and I can help with that, but the current model needs to be changed.

  • Indonesian Users

    Hmmm.
    Seems The Medal points make newbie manager/manager with low rank will easy to grow up.

    And the manager who played OSM generally will found it a bit difficult.
    Hmmm,interesting.

  • Arabic Users

  • Portuguese Users

    I agree with the medals system, because you have to be fully dedicated to the game and active in every slot. The medals ranking it's the best way of knowing who are the "in-form" playeers. Even though I am already on the 9th division I want to enter leagues that are competitive, so that I can be a better manager. Only playing against CPU and noob players it doesn't motivate me anymore. I din't care If I lose medals. What is the Point of topping the medals ranking if you don't play against the best managers? The players who don't want to participate in competitive leagues simply din't deserve my respect. If everybody play by the rules the medals ranking is pretty cool! 🙂

  • French Users

    The classification of medals on separate locations allows you to play medals and other competitions organized by moderators such as Crew Cup or competitions in our countries.

  • French Users

    I also want to clarify that if options are deactivated in your championships, you do not get bonus medals at the end of the championship. It's a scam!

  • French Users

    @ruipsc5
    HI,
    It's like saying to Nadal or Federer, if you lose in the final of Rolland Garros, Wimbledon and the US Open, you will be behind players who have won tournaments in their village in the ATP ranking ... That's what medals are all about. .. It seems to me not complicated to make a system allowing to continue playing big competitions without this being a disadvantage for the classification having in particular to put forward the best OSM players.

  • Portuguese Users

    @timilic7 Hey! In the end of the day, the player who wins more leagues, cups and leagues will top the medals ranking! Once you spoke in a tennis language... The medals ranking is the ATP Champions Race. The regular ranking is the ATP World Ranking. I think there is space for both of them. Have a Nice 2021! 💪

  • French Users

    To win medals, you have to play a lot of league against mediocre coaches. We can not therefore play strong competitions in crew under penalty of falling in the rankings. In the end, either the best players who fight for their ranking will abandon their crew to not go down the rankings, or the ranking will not really be representative of the strength of the players. Sometimes I feel like Gamebasic's goal is to destroy crews. After the end of the old battles, here is another blow to the world of crews. Without the crews and their competitions, a very interesting part of the game would be gone. I have found in the crews that I have frequented more than players, they are my friends (even if it is only virtual), without a crew I think the game would lose a lot of old players, who have contributed a lot to this game. In summary, the problem is not just the medal ranking, but general and if the goal is to prevent players from meeting as a crew, then gamebasic just has to say it openly I would find it braucoup faster. The general level of OSM will be pulled down favoring the noobs who may be spending more coins than the old ones ... (maybe it is OSM's bet?) Good day to you all. Here is my humble opinion.

  • Portuguese Users

    @pagno7 I am part of a crew and have a slot fully dedicated to it. I play competitive leagues where the teams have all the same goal and squad value and where you can't train your players or do friendlies. I try not to play against weak players. And after all that I am top 220 in the World and top 15 in my country. It is possible to perform well on both rankings!

  • French Users

    @ruipsc5 A location for your Crew.I have three locations for my Crew, of course sometimes my available ones are not used if my Crew needs so we lose points when the location is free, after each one plays as he wants but for my Crew competitionsare much more interesting than doing a basic three championship, without Crew I stop the game.

  • French Users

    @ruipsc5
    HI,
    So we can't understand each other ... Being in the 15 in my country and the top 100 in the world is not necessarily what I call performing ... But what bothers me in this ranking is that it puts the players at a disadvantage. players playing real championships like you or me .. High level battle, WC among other things ...... since in these Championships we necessarily lose more medals than we win .... And to be world top 10 For 3 years in a ranking, the one in coaching points, with two world championship finals and being 120 th in the other I find that totally inconsistent ...
    Happy New Year to you too coach !!!!

  • Portuguese Users

    @timilic7 True! I understand what you are trying to say. 🙂 All we have to do is win 20 out of 22 in those competitive championships! 😜😜 Good luck, bro!