WCC 2016 - Round 3

[I Love Niken]

Just resync

@Wahyu-sigit-madridista said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

1. First TC :

2. Second TC :

3. Third TC :

4. Fourth TC :

5. EXTRA TC :

RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts

I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks

Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp :

[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :

OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]

*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski

[Lord Supreme]

@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)

I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.

[J.Shephard]

@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)

I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.

Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"

[Sawsilvio]

Do not qualify with 1080 points of difference. There are no words

[Adilmo Rocha]

@J.Shephard @Lord-Supreme

Same criteria this CCL.

Next edition we change!

[Angel Sanctis]

@Lafuens Confirmed. Congratulations on the battle!!

[romito61]

[romito61]

[Maio66]

Group A:
The Brotherhood vs. Lotus
[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/fa5t9j.jpg[/IMG]

confirmed

[iñaki bielsa]

GROUP P - Round 3

Red Skulls :1291
Osm Striker Ultras :1178

difference +113

confirmation of the rival captain (chwris)

[Sonny Légendaire DIEU OSM]

@wahyu sigit
There are not the dates on these screens... it is not admissible...

[MenagerBL]

@Sawsilvio
Yes mate, the rules are stupid.
There are much noob crews who disrupt the fair-play, so many strong crews got knocked-out and some weak (or not especially strong) crews go to the next round.
Next time think good before you participate in a tournament with +120 crews.
Best regards.

[Aldy Brahmantyo]

@OL.Lyonnais11

First

Second

Third

Fourth

Fifth

You want the date right? Now you get it.

[I Love Niken]

Hello @Adilmo-Rocha this results is unconfirmed (AAM vs MP), but you still put it in the document. Every 1 point is very valuable for us. Because in other groups, many crews who do not respect by leaving the competition.

And with all due respect, you might forget to change it #regards

[Adilmo Rocha]

@I-Love-Niken

Murat (@mrtgll33 ) updated with the board posted in the forum! What is the real and confirmed score with the opponent?

[Bayram Karakuş]

There are teams that do not deliver the results. I still the war continues

[mrtgll33_]

@I-Love-Niken The results can be changed, I wrote the first result. This is not disrespectful, I wrote a conclusion because everyone wondered. I say again, there may be a change depending on the situation.

Now is what problem ?

[I Love Niken]

@Adilmo-Rocha
It's the right one.

[mrtgll33_]

@I-Love-Niken If the rival crew approves, the score may change.

[Aldy Brahmantyo]

@OL.Lyonnais11 I don't know what you're thinking about, mate. Your teammate, @jeremy566 clearly made a fatal and ridiculous violation when your crew was already defeated with a big differences. When we know that we will absolutely lose, it doesn't mean we can break the rules and made a fatal violation like your teammate did. My friend already asked a confirmation nicely with privat message include claim this penalty, but nothing response from your crew. And know you tried to make a same funny alibi or reasons that doesn't make sense.
I hope this is a good lesson for us, being gentleman when we're already defeated is still better than this case.