General Talking Points


  • Okay, so I have come up with an idea where I will write a talking point. People will naturally argue for, and against the talking point. As this evolves, we can make it a competition where a neutral can judge which individual puts up the best case. Or perhaps teams if we generate enough interest.

    First though we will give it a trial run without judges or teams.

    For the record, I've not asked for permission because I have contributed a lot to these forums over the last 7 years and devoted a lot of time and effort doing prediction leagues, 8-Ball Pool, etc. Also, this is not evolved in to a forum game yet

    Talking point #1
    Should Capital Punishment be abolished?

    It's a generic talking point, but gradually the talking points will become more and more original and more interesting.


  • I think this is a typically difficult question to answer. Firstly, religion massively influences people's beliefs on this. But my belief is exempt of any religious bias. I was indoctrinated in to Catholic values until I reached the age of reason, and realised I never wished to be associated with any religion at all (including atheism). So this is purely based on my own moral compass, my own abilities to decipher between right and wrong.

    I believe in compassion for life in general (and that includes other terrestrial and extra terrestrial species). And Murderers, Rapists, etc. are a clear breach of any compassion for life. Once that boundary is crossed, these people deserve to be punished in some form. First I think it's reasonable to put myself in the victims loved ones shoes, for example, someone had raped and murdered my daughter.

    What emotion would that evoke? Its all good trying to pretend here that I am all holy and would forgive everyone no matter the level of evil the person has to commit this act. Do I think forgiving someone like this is a noble thing to do? No I do not. Doing so is sheer denial of natural emotion.

    I don't believe in violence either. But if someone did something this sick and abhorrent to a loved one of mine, my moral compass tells me I'd be right to kick the living shit out of the guy. Would it change the original crime from occuring? No. But that venomous release would be healthy. And justified in my opinion. And if that person was beaten to the point of death, I wouldn't see that person as a murderer. I'd see it as someone who loved his daughter.

    There's external factors that affect the criminals behaviour such as mental illness (perhaps they're sociopathic or psychopathic) In which case, it's not the criminals fault. If a person isn't in control of their moral compass due to this, they need to be segregated from society totally.

    Having a rough upbringing is a different kettle of fish totally. Criminals may have been manipulated, raped, beaten, etc. by their parents or guardians. Its horrible, and certainly a huge disadvantage in terms of knowing what's right and wrong. They weren't taught that by their parents. They were used to being the victim and their view of normal behaviour differs to the general concensus. As much as I agree that people like this are more likely to go to a life of crime, lots and lots of people have had the same kind of background and went on to harm no one (incredible amount of respect for these people by the way) so inflicting that same pain on others is not necessary.

    Anyway, the state killing serious criminals after years of imprisonment (with their pool tables, TV, And being Bill-free) will not bring justice to the families nor prevent the crime from happening. I'd also like to point out that some people do change and are repentent. Some have left jail and vowed to help the sick or poor to try to make up for their crime. So killing them prevents the chance of people changing.

    Some people could be helped by rehabilitation. It really depends which method suits which type of criminal. Of course, certain criminals are 'beyond repair'.

    Sometimes Capital Punishment is carried out by flawed justice systems. E.g. racially aggravated, black people more likely to be put on death row in certain places and China disclosing the amount of people sentenced to death. I don't trust these authorities at all.

    Statistics have shown that the Death Penalty hasn't really acted as an effective deterrent (really surprised me to be honest) it's also very expensive keeping convicts on death row, eating in to the tax payers (potentially innocent people) money.

    For these reasons, I'm against Capital Punishment. And murdering criminals seems a pointless action given the fact the damage has already been done. I can however there are many counter arguments that I agree with. Which is why I don't defend the abolishment of Capital punishment as strongly as Amnesty for example. The ability to see both sides of a debate is a beautiful thing.


  • I don't agree with it because it's barbaric, pointless and innocents often die. If you trade an eye for an eye the whole world will be blind, so what gives the justice system the right to take a human life? Speaking of the innocent people; every year, thousands of people are put on death row for a crime they didn't even commit. There's no way of knowing if they actually did or not. Is it worth the risk? It can be seen as a cruel and unusual punishment. Crime will always be apart of the world and there will be better ways to handle it.


  • This interest in this thread is shite. Feel free to close this if you feel its necessary


  • @WrinkledPaulsack Yeah, maybe not many debating lads here. Also .no one can disagree with our points because its perfect. haha


  • I put a lot of effort in to this "useless" topic.

    The next talking point:

    Are violent video games to blame for violent behaviour among children?

  • English Moderator

    @WrinkledPaulsack Thanks for making this topic. I mustn't have had time to reply when you first made it.

    About your new question I think that video games do play a part, but I do not think they solely can be blamed. I don't see why anyone would actually want to play a game that involves killing people and generally your success is based upon how many people you kill etc.. It doesn't take a genius to work out that this must have an affect on people. Plus I think many studies have actually concluded that violent games do actually have an affect on children.

    But like I said they can not solely be blamed, there are other factors like their upbringing that could affect them too.

Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to OSM Forum was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.