OSM: The game

@Vinçentó-Beçker_NL I actually do that too, lining up first and then training but checking training every 8 hours and coming on before match to put those players in line up who have completed training it's all too stressful 😛 and mistakes are made sometimes. But as you said it's not such a big need - that is right.

v3 is all about money. It is not related to what is improved or what you can do now and you've couldn't do it before.

In order to enjoy the all good things that were implemented and also to be able to fight every time for good places, you will need to spend a lot of money. It is not necessary to do simple math calculations because above there are already members that highlighted how is the difference in money between v2 and v3 of OSM.

The situation now is like below:

play without BC and no chances to win leagues with many users (no matter of what team you select) use BC and improve everything on each season = spend a looooot of money enjoy the game as it is or do not play it anymore

My curiosity on all the discussion here is: does OSM bring more money now than in the past? Probably yes, since the prices are so high. The creators are satisfied with this, even if the number or players buying tickets/playing is probably less than before.

Guys, it is all about money nowadays. We need to understand that this is the reality and we play it accordingly or stop playing it. Even reducing the players bought from scoutlist, camps and everything and it will never be as before from the money point of view. At least triple will be now, with all the changes (if SOMEHOW and SOMEDAY will happen).

@oukatouc Still he would never perform like a 95 attacker, even if you have a 80-85 attacker then use that one instead because at least he would be playing in the position he was originally meant to play, so an 80-85 attacker could perform better than a midfielder with 95 attack in my opinion.
Also if you use an attacker with average skills then pogba would be free and hence could be placed on midfield (where he was supposed to be) and that would probably be a stronger and more reliable line up.
In my opinion, using a player with 90+ stats out of position is just a waste of a superstar because he wouldn't perform like a 90 so I suggest not to put a player out of position unless you have no other choice.

@Veve-D the transfer embargo. Only hardcore!